Mimics natural anatomy, respecting the biological distance in all dimensions. Optimized crestal bone preservation with
Bone Control Design™
High predictability, shorter healing times and enhanced bone regeneration even at compromised sites with
Reduced invasiveness thanks to smaller implants with our high-performance material
Simplified treatment and increased efficiency in daily practice.
Greatly facilitated thanks to prosthetic margin at tissue level.
Also available as guided implants.
Built-in emergence profile facilitates soft tissue management.
The Straumann® Standard Implant – a pioneer in transgingival healing – is especially suitable for classic one-stage surgery and a proven solution for predictable treatment outcomes in all indications. It features the
and is used with the corresponding prosthetic components (
Straumann® synOcta portfolio
Straumann® Solid Abutment
). Its machined neck of 2.8 mm is optimal for a thick mucosa in classic single-stage procedures where the implant is placed at soft tissue level for transgingival healing.
The Straumann® Standard Plus Implant was designed for optimal esthetics in the anterior region, whilst still respecting the biologic width. Particularly when esthetic demands are high, its shorter machined neck of 1.8 mm provides high flexibility in soft tissue management, allowing for trans-, semi- and sub-gingival healing.
With its Ø 3.3 mm endosteal diameter, the Straumann® Standard Plus Narrow Neck CrossFit® (NNC) Implant is the implant of choice for narrow interdental spaces or narrow bone ridges, while still respecting the biologic width. High mechanical strength allows this implant to be placed in the anterior and premolar area for all different types of restorations. No splinting with other implants is needed. The thread pitch of 0.8 mm is designed for excellent primary stability. In contrast to other members of the “Standard Plus” product family, the NNC features the self-guiding internal CrossFit® connection at soft tissue level. The Ø 3.5 mm prosthetic platform allows for a wide range of restorative options.
The Straumann® Tapered Effect Implant features a tapered coronal part to optimal fit the post-extraction socket. This anatomical design makes it particularly suitable for immediate or early implantation following extraction or loss of natural teeth. With the 1.8 mm machined neck, the biologic width is respected and healing can occur trans- or subgingivally. The low thread pitch and the self-tapping geometry enable for excellent primary stability in all bone classes. 8
View selected scientific literature
Derks J, Schaller D, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy. Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan; 95(1):43-9. (Doctoral thesis reference: ISBN 978-91-628- 9491-7).
Buser D, Janner SFM, Wittneben J-G, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10-Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):839-851. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x.
Wittneben J-G, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and Failure Rates with Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses and Single Crowns: A 10-Year Retrospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(3):356-364. doi:10.1111/cid.12066.
Fischer K., Stenberg T. al Prospective 10-year Cohort Study Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) on Implant-Supported Full-Arch Maxillary Prostheses. Part 1: Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants and Mucosal Tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Research. 2012 Dec;14(6):808-15
Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic outcomes and maintenance. Clin Implant Dent Relat Research.. 2013 Aug;15(4):498-508
Calvo-Guirado JL, et al: Evaluation of extra short 4 mm implants in mandibular edentulous patients with reduced bone height in comparison with standard implants: a 12-month results. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 00, 2015, 1–8 doi: 10.1111/clr.12704
Sahrmann P. et al: Success of 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A 3-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal of Dental Res. 2016, DOI: 10.1177/0022034516633432
Takeshi Toyoshima et al. Primary Stability of a Hybrid Self-Tapping Implant Compared to a Cylindrical Non-Self-Tapping Implant with Respect to Drilling Protocols in an Ex Vivo Model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):71-8.